Welfare invoice passes by majority of 75 as large climbdown heads off Labour revolt – because it occurred

Abstract of occasions

• MPs voted by way of the federal government’s welfare invoice by 335 votes to 260 – a majority of 75 – after a insurgent modification to kill off the invoice was defeated simply after concessions over deliberate Pip cuts (See 19.27).

• The work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, dominated out resigning in her interview with Chris Mason, the BBC political editor, saying she needed to hold on regardless of her invoice solely passing after a number of U-turns (See 19.51).

• After every week of chaos that left the prime minister’s political authority badly broken, Labour MPs have been lastly received over by a dedication to shelve plans for deep cuts to non-public independence funds (Pip)

We’re closing this weblog now. Thanks for studying

Modifications to the common credit score and Pip invoice imply no financial savings for the chancellor on this parliament, in line with the Institute for Fiscal Research (IFS).

Helen Miller, the deputy director of IFS, stated there’s a “pronounced rise” in working-age health-related advantages. Spending is rising from £52bn final yr and, with out reform, is forecast to succeed in £66bn by 2029–30.

The federal government’s unique reform was set to avoid wasting £5.5bn within the brief run (by 2029–30) and double that in the long term when absolutely rolled out.

With out reform to non-public independence cost, the watered down invoice shouldn’t be anticipated to ship any financial savings over the following 4 years.

It’s because over this era the forecast financial savings from lowering the common credit score (UC) well being ingredient for brand new claimants (£1.7bn in 2029–30) will probably be roughly offset by the price of rising the UC customary allowance.

This can be a authorities with a majority of 165 that’s seemingly unable to reform both pensioner winter gasoline funds or working-age incapacity advantages. That doesn’t bode nicely for these hoping this authorities will grasp the nettle and handle the deeper, structural challenges going through the UK public funds.

Scotland’s social justice secretary, Shirley-Anne Somerville, has stated the UK authorities dangers making a “deeply unfair” two-tier system if it presses forward with plans to push the influence of cuts on to future candidates for incapacity advantages and that it ought to abandon the invoice fully.

Somerville confirmed that her authorities had no plans to row again assist for disabled folks in Scotland.

The UK authorities must cease balancing the books on the backs of among the most weak folks in society. They should correctly hearken to the overwhelming criticism their proposals have generated and do the precise factor by disabled folks by abandoning this invoice totally.

I wish to reassure disabled folks in Scotland, that the Scottish authorities won’t lower Scotland’s grownup incapacity cost – we won’t let disabled folks down because the UK authorities has performed.

Initially, 150,000 unpaid carers stood to lose carer’s allowance at a finances discount of £500m by 2030, in line with the charity Carers UK.

Helen Walker, chief government of Carers UK, welcomed the concessions relating to Pip.

Unpaid carers will probably be vastly relieved that the federal government has recognised the dangerous influence the proposed adjustments to Pip may have on entire households.

Legislating for a system that will be below assessment would have been totally within the flawed order.

These proposals have prompted untold stress and fear for a lot of 1000’s of carers. It’s the precise resolution to make sure that the Timms assessment of Pip is concluded and that the implications for unpaid carers are identified earlier than the federal government takes any additional steps.

The chief of Reform UK, Nigel Farage, has supplied his response to the passing of a a lot modified invoice. Talking on GB Information he stated that the federal government is “in big trouble” and advised Keir Starmer is a “puppet”.

U-turn after U-turn after U-turn, denial of what he stated within the speech on immigration, ‘oh, I regret it, I regret it, I hadn’t learn it’, a self-admission that he’s a puppet.

At this time, to keep away from doubtlessly an enormous defeat within the Home of Commons, a watering down of a invoice that renders it virtually meaningless. I’m wanting on the massive image. This authorities is in massive bother.

We voted in opposition to it, as a result of I received’t carry a finger to assist a authorities that’s doing a lot injury to our nation.

Ruth Curtice, chief government of the Decision Basis thinktank, says the concession introduced at the moment implies that within the medium time period – the related interval for the chancellor’s fiscal guidelines – the welfare reforms will now save roughly no cash in any respect. However that doesn’t imply they’re completely pointless, she says on Bluesky.

The most recent u-turn appears to be eradicating all PIP adjustments from the invoice. Remaining web financial savings within the essential yr for fiscal guidelines of….about zero. Doesn’t imply the invoice is nothing although: nonetheless crucial adjustments to, and a wise rebalancing of, common credit score (with financial savings in future years)

That’s all from me for tonight. Morgan Ofori is now taking up.

Teams representing the disabled have combined views on what occurred this night. Whereas Mencap issued a press release welcoming the dropping of the Pip parts of the invoice (see 6.43pm), different charities spotlight their issues about what’s left within the invoice.

Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs on the MS Society, stated:

The federal government has been compelled to hearken to disabled folks on the eleventh hour. And that’s due to folks with MS who’ve despatched 1000’s of emails, made a whole lot of telephone calls, and had numerous conversations with MPs to make their voices heard.

Whereas we’re relieved that the federal government are dropping a few of their most catastrophic plans for PIP, and committing to a assessment earlier than any adjustments go forward, we nonetheless imagine this invoice dangers inflicting hurt to disabled folks.

Pushing by way of cuts to these on Common Credit score who’re unable to work is unfair and merciless.

And James Taylor, government director at incapacity equality charity Scope, stated:

It’s proper to seek the advice of and have interaction with disabled folks earlier than making sweeping adjustments to Pip. Modifications that will have made a whole lot of 1000’s of claimants worse off. Modifications that might have been averted altogether.

We now want cast-iron affirmation that future reforms will probably be genuinely co-produced with disabled folks, as promised.

Nevertheless, this invoice nonetheless consists of measures that may strip 1000’s of kilos in assist from disabled folks.

Our evaluation reveals disabled households will face virtually £15,000 a yr in further prices by 2030. Beneath these adjustments, greater than 700,000 future common credit score well being claimants would obtain on common £3,000 much less assist every year than claimants do now.

Ed Davey, the Lib Dem chief, issued this assertion after the welfare invoice handed tonight. He stated:

That is no approach to run a rustic.

The federal government ought to scrap this failed invoice altogether and work cross-party to really carry down the welfare invoice by getting folks into work.

There have been 42 Labour MPs who voted for the Maskell amendments. However two Labour MPs acted as tellers within the division for the ayes – Clive Lewis and Andy McDonald – and they aren’t included within the 42, though they have been serving to them. They each voted in opposition to the invoice too.

Different Labour MPs who didn’t vote for the Maskell modification however who did vote in opposition to the invoice getting a second studying embrace Rosena Allin-Khan, Marsha de Cordova, Abtisam Mohamed and Marie Tidball.

The division lists are right here.

Q: However what’s left within the invoice?

Kendall claimed there have been some “really important changes” to common credit score left within the invoice. And the precise to attempt adjustments have been vital, she stated.

Q: However you made an argument that present welfare spending was unsustainable – and now you’re not going to avoid wasting any cash?

Kendall claimed the measures within the invoice would nonetheless assist to get extra folks into work, saving the federal government cash.

Q: Haven’t you came upon that, even with a whopping majorty, Labour is essentially unwilling to reform the welfare state? Your plans are within the skip. They’re useless, they’re buried.

Kendall stated reform was vital, and Labour was beginning to ship change.

Q: How do you assess the PM’s authority?

Kendall stated persons are “100% behind a prime minister who secured the first Labour government in 14 years”.

However there are classes to be taught, she stated.

Q: What’s the key lesson to be taught? This has been an unedifying week for the federal government.

Kendall stated welfare reform was at all times tough, maybe notably for Labour governments.

She stated it had been “a bumpy time tonight”, however the social gathering would go ahead collectively.

Chris Mason opened his interview by placing it to Liz Kendall that this course of had been shambolic.

Kendall replied:

I want we had obtained so far otherwise, and there are completely classes to be taught, however I believe it’s actually vital we’ve handed this invoice for second studying. It places in place some actually vital reforms to the welfare system.

Q: Is your place tenable? You’ve been humiliated.

Kendall replied:

I believe listening is definitely a power in politics, as certainly it’s in life, and I’ll proceed to hearken to colleagues, completely.

What was very fascinating was how a lot assist there was for the precept of reforming the welfare state, that those that can work ought to work, however need assistance to take action, and that we have to shield those that can’t work.