It was one of the vital potent speaking factors in the course of the Coalition’s marketing campaign towards “rushed” visas to Palestinians fleeing Gaza.
“It is not appropriate to give 3,000 tourist visas to people leaving a war zone controlled by a terrorist organisation in an average of 24 hours,” the Liberal senator James Paterson instructed Sky Information on 20 August.
Variations of the identical declare have been utilized by a spread of Coalition politicians, and rose in frequency in August because the opposition chief, Peter Dutton, escalated his political assaults on the federal government over nationwide safety.
However Guardian Australia has confirmed with knowledgeable sources that the Division of Dwelling Affairs’ median processing time for Palestinian customer visas within the interval October 2023 to August 2024 was a lot greater: 4 months.
In the event you drill down simply to the preliminary interval 7 October to 31 December, the median time was faster – seven days – however even that’s seven instances so long as the 24-hour declare, and there may be extra to it than meets the attention.
Guardian Australia understands the faster processing time within the months instantly after the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led assaults on Israel was a operate of the prioritisation course of, slightly than any basic change in method in 2024.
Dwelling affairs officers dealt first with purposes that had been thought-about more likely to have the next prospect of success, reminiscent of kids who’ve visited Australia earlier than and have household connections within the nation.
Officers left different purposes that had been thought-about to be incomplete, questionable or doubtlessly fraudulent till afterward to evaluate the data and decide. The rejections tended to be finalised later within the course of.
Australia granted 2,922 visas to Palestinians and rejected an extra 7,111 visa purposes between 7 October 2023 and 12 August 2024, in line with beforehand launched figures. Solely an estimated 1,300 Palestinians who had been granted these visas have to this point been capable of make it to Australia.
The Coalition’s use of the 24-hour speaking level ramped up in August when Dutton referred to as for a short lived pause on all arrivals from Gaza – regardless that the Rafah border crossing had been closed for departures since Might.
However throughout the entire of the interval October 2023 to August 2024, regardless that some purposes had been dealt with comparatively shortly, the bulk took greater than every week.
The place did the 24-hour determine come from?
The claims will be traced to a brief change between a senior residence affairs official and Paterson, the shadow minister, throughout a Senate estimates listening to in Canberra on 12 February.
Paterson was asking the division official, Michael Willard, about Palestinian visa purposes authorized to this point after which requested: “What’s the average processing time for a visa like this?”
Willard replied: “Globally, for a visitor visa the median processing time is one day.”
It’s notable that the reply started with the caveat “globally”; he wasn’t answering particularly about Palestinian candidates. This caveat would fall away in subsequent reporting and political debate.
Because the 12 February listening to continued, Paterson pointed to an ABC story that included one anecdotal report {that a} Palestinian-Australian man who lived in Melbourne had managed to safe a customer visa for his mom, aged in her 70s, in a single hour.
Paterson requested: “Does that sound right to you? Is it possible that a visitor visa was approved in a single hour?”
Willard didn’t reply definitively however agreed that “it is possible”. Willard stated the Division of Dwelling Affairs held “a vast range of information” and “apply that information to the circumstances presented in a visitor visa application”.
Persevering with within the summary, Willard stated: “There could be circumstances where someone, for example, has a strong travel record, is well known to us and has a routine that we’re familiar with, where the visitor visa could be granted in that time frame.”
Paterson rounded off the road of questioning by asking: “Was anything about the process expedited or modified in any way to facilitate applications?”
Willard was emphatic. “No,” he stated. He stated the division was “taking a similar approach to what we’ve taken in previous situations” and making use of “priority processing to people who have strong Australian connections who are seeking to travel”.
‘Unacceptable’
Seven days later, the Sky Information Australia host Sharri Markson seized on the change to blast the federal government’s dealing with of the matter.
“Foreign minister Penny Wong assured us, repeatedly, in multiple television interviews that rigorous security checks were being done,” Markson instructed viewers of her primetime program on 19 February.
“Well, her comments were incorrect. Because officials have revealed in Senate estimates that far from rigorous security checks, which as Asio has said can take months, these visas were being approved in a single day. One day. Have a look.”
This system then broadcast a clip of change, which did embrace Willard’s disclaimer that the one-day median processing time determine was “globally”.
after e-newsletter promotion
Markson continued: “One day. And that was, by the way, shadow home affairs minister James Paterson doing that questioning – he did a sensational job. But if that’s not disturbing enough, one day, some visas for Palestinians were apparently granted in an hour.”
Markson concluded: “It’s unacceptable that visas are being approved within one day, and potentially one hour.”
The next day, Paterson raised the alarm himself in an interview with one other Sky Information host, Peta Credlin.
“Not only did they say that on average these visas are approved in 24 hours, they concede it was possible that in at least one case, a visa was granted in a single hour,” Paterson instructed Credlin. “Now, how on earth is it possible to do any security checks at all if it is being turned around in just one hour?”
On ABC Radio Nationwide Breakfast, Paterson was requested by Patricia Karvelas: “Why don’t you trust our intelligence agencies to properly vet people being granted these visas?”
He replied: “I do trust our intelligence agencies, but they’ve been given an impossible task. And that task is to approve people from a war zone controlled by a terrorist organisation in as little as 24 hours, on average.”
Use of this talking-point ramped up in August, with Guardian Australia figuring out a minimum of 12 Coalition interview transcripts that included the 24-hour-average declare in that month.
They embrace the Coalition’s Senate chief and overseas affairs spokesperson, Simon Birmingham, who instructed Sky Information on 14 August that the typical 24-hour declare was “a statement of reality”.
Birmingham instructed ABC Radio Nationwide on 19 August that he “completely rejected” claims that Dutton was utilizing the visa problem to whip up worry and unfold division. Birmingham repeated the determine.
Mr Dutton wrote in an op-ed for the Information Corp Sunday tabloids on 18 August: “[The] hopeless former immigration minister, Andrew Giles, granted tourist visas to 3000 Gazans – an entirely inappropriate visa for people coming to Australia from a war zone and territory controlled by terrorists. These visas were granted in 24 hours, on average.”
Paterson says officers ought to ‘correct their evidence’ if ‘not accurate’
Guardian Australia requested Paterson on Friday whether or not he accepted his commentary had created a false or deceptive impression on a factual matter, why he had interpreted the “global” determine as making use of to the Palestinian applicant cohort particularly, and whether or not he had performed any additional due diligence on the declare.
He responded that the one data accessible on the general public document and to the opposition concerning the common processing time of Gaza customer visas “was the evidence given by Home Affairs officials in estimates”.
“The Senate’s standing orders are clear [that] officials must correct their evidence as soon as they become aware it is not accurate so that senators and the public can rely on it,” Paterson stated.
“It is up to the government to explain why they have not provided this updated estimate earlier.”
Guardian Australia just isn’t suggesting that officers misled the estimates committee, provided that Willard included the caveat “globally” slightly than particularly referring to Palestinian candidates.
Paterson reiterated his view on Friday that the Albanese authorities had presided over a “rushed and risky visa process” and candidates “should have been assessed offshore for humanitarian visas with full checks as occurred with the Syrian and Afghanistan intakes”.
A spokesperson for the Division of Dwelling Affairs stated: “In order to be granted a visa, every person must satisfy the requirements of the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration Regulations 1994, including health, security and character criteria.
“All Palestinian visa applications were individually assessed by a departmental officer. An officer considers the individual circumstances of the applicant to decide if they have demonstrated they meet all requirements.”
Dutton and Birmingham had been additionally contacted for remark. Markson was provided the chance to reply relating to her Sky Information protection of the identical matter.
