Tories say letting individuals vote at 16, however not be a candidate till 18, is ‘hopelessly confused’ – UK politics stay

Right here is the total textual content of the federal government’s “strategy for modern and secure elections”.

And right here is the textual content of a letter from Rushanara Ali, the democracy minister, to officers about what the plans contain.

That is how the federal government describes the “civil society covenant” that Keir Starmer is speaking about in its information launch.

At its core, the covenant is about delivering actual change for working individuals – strengthening public providers, creating protected communities, and offering new alternatives for communities to thrive. It provides civil society a house on the coronary heart of presidency and recognises that nationwide renewal can’t be delivered from Westminster alone.

Starmer mentioned this method was about “rebalancing power and responsibility”. He mentioned:

Not the top-down method of the state working alone. Not the transactional method of markets left to their very own gadgets. However a brand new method ahead – the place authorities and civil society work facet by facet to ship actual change.

Starmer didn’t point out votes at 16 in his speech.

Whereas Rushanara Ali is answering the pressing query within the Commons, Keir Starmer is talking on the occasion the place he’s saying a “civil society covenant”.

There’s a stay feed right here.

Paul Holmes, a Conservative, tabled the pressing query on elections technique paper printed right this moment. (An earlier put up mistakenly mentioned he was Lib Dem – sorry.)

Holmes complained that the federal government was not saying these measures by way of a proper assertion.

On votes at 16, he claimed this proposal was not in line with different coverage about when individuals change into adults. He mentioned:

Why does this authorities suppose a 16-year-old can vote however not be allowed to purchase a lottery ticket or an alcoholic drink, marry or go to battle, and even stand within the elections they’re voting? It isn’t the federal government’s place on the age of maturity simply hopelessly confused?

Within the Commons Rushanara Ali, democracy minister within the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Native Authorities, is answering an pressing query on the federal government’s technique for elections printed right this moment.

Right here is the division’s information launch on the technique, specializing in the proposal to permit votes at 16.

And here’s a written assertion from Ali on the plans.

The voting age will likely be lowered to 16 in England and Northern Eire by the subsequent normal election in a significant change of the democratic system, Rowena Mason reviews.

Reform UK has instructed Britain’s greatest wind and photo voltaic builders it’s going to finish their entry to a clear vitality subsidy scheme if it wins energy, PA Media reviews. PA says:

Deputy chief Richard Tice has written to companies giving them “formal notice” that the occasion would axe offers geared toward providing sustainable mills safety in opposition to market volatility.

The Contracts for Distinction (CfD) scheme sees builders assured a set worth for electrical energy – unbiased of the wholesale worth – within the hope of encouraging corporations to spend money on renewable initiatives.

In a letter to corporations together with Octopus Power and SSE Renewables , Tice claimed “there is no public mandate for the real-world consequences” of the clear energy agenda. If Reform gained an election, he mentioned “we will seek to strike down all contracts signed under AR7” – the upcoming allocation spherical for CfDs.

“Let me be clear: if you enter bids in AR7, you do so at your own risk. The political consensus that has sheltered your industry for nearly two decades is fracturing.”

He added that participation within the upcoming CfD public sale “carries significant political, financial and regulatory risk” for firm shareholders.

Local weather analysts mentioned the transfer would drive away funding and put British jobs in jeopardy.

Commenting on the transfer, a Labour occasion spokesperson mentioned:

Reform are actually actively attempting to discourage companies from investing in clear vitality within the UK – leaving payments increased for households, threatening lots of of 1000’s of excellent jobs throughout the nation and placing our vitality safety in danger. They’re disgracefully attempting to undermine the UK’s nationwide curiosity.

This Labour authorities is slicing vitality payments for tens of millions of households, faculties, and hospitals, and creating good jobs in our industrial heartlands, to place extra money in working individuals’s pockets. Reform try to place all of this in danger.

And Jess Ralston, an analyst on the Power and Local weather Intelligence Unit, a thinktank selling knowledgeable debate on local weather points, mentioned:

The goal of the letter seems to be to place good, well-paid British jobs in jeopardy, driving away funding within the economic system and denying individuals the chance to make a residing. Polling exhibits the general public see clear vitality because the primary progress sector for the UK.

Arguing in opposition to British renewables is arguing for extra international fuel, which can more and more come from overseas because the North Sea continues its inevitable decline – a geological truth. Gasoline has price the UK £140bn over the previous few years and is about to stay costlier than pre-crisis ranges in the long run. So constructing extra renewables means vitality safety and shielding households from risky worldwide fuel markets, which the voting public are eager to see.

Unemployment climbed and wage progress slowed within the three months to Might, in accordance with official figures that can strain the Financial institution of England to chop rates of interest subsequent month. Phillip Inman has the story.

Rachael Maskell, one of many 4 Labour MPs suspended from the parliamentary occasion yesterday, tabled the reasoned modification that might have killed off the welfare invoice. She pushed it to a vote even after a last-minute concession from the federal government that ripped out the clauses that might have minimize eligibility for Pip, a incapacity profit.

In an interview on the At the moment programme this morning, Maskell defended her actions. She mentioned:

I don’t see myself as a ringleader, I joined with different colleagues who had comparable issues about this laws. We finally do consider that slicing cash from among the poorest in our society is just not what a Labour authorities must be doing.

After all I dropped at parliament the voices of my constituents, in actual fact I instructed tales inside the debate about their fragile psychological well being and the implications of shedding cash and the reforms would have on them.

Fairly frankly, disabled individuals are very invisible in our society, they don’t have company and voice. What was so necessary about that debate was the popularity of that.

Requested repeatedly if she was keen to alter her behaviour so she could possibly be readmitted to the parliamentary Labour occasion, Maskell mentioned she was Labour “through and through” and that she hoped the occasion would be taught. When Nick Robinson, the presenter, put the query for the third time, Maskell replied: “It’s not about my behaviour.” Robinson mentioned it was, as a result of that was why she was suspended. He then requested Maskell to substantiate that she wouldn’t change her behaviour, and Maskell replied: “I will continue to advocate for my constituents, of course.”

Eleni Courea has extra on the interview right here.

Diane Abbott has mentioned she has no regrets about feedback on racism that led to her year-long suspension from the Labour occasion, Eleni Courea reviews.

There are two pressing questions within the Commons right this moment after 10.30am: first one from the Paul Holmes (Con) concerning the authorities’s elections technique, being printed right this moment, after which one from one other Tory, Luke Evans, about NHS pensions and the affect of administrative delays on frontline care.

After that, from about 11.30am, we’ll get the enterprise assertion from Lucy Powell, chief of the Commons, adopted by a press release about Ukraine from John Healey, the defence secretary.

Good morning. Chief whips tends to be fairly secretive, and when 4 Labour MPs had the whip suspended yesterday, there was no detailed, public rationalization as to why they had been being punished for rebelling when so many different backbenchers, who’ve additionally voted in opposition to the occasion, haven’t been singled out. As Eleni Courea and Jessica Elgot report in our in a single day story, we had been simply instructed they had been common rebels.

However one of the best rationalization got here from the Labour occasion supply who instructed Geri Scott from the Instances that the 4 MPs – Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff – had been being punished for “persistent knobheadery”.

That is problematic as a result of, if “persistent knobheadery” is against the law, then among the best parliamentarians of all time had been additionally responsible of it. Winston Churchill is thought to be a hero, however he twice switched events and within the Thirties, when he was main a lonely combat in opposition to his occasion and over self-government for India and appeasement, “knobhead” would have been one of many politer issues colleagues would have mentioned about him. The identical is true of Aneurin Bevan through the second world battle, and once more within the Fifties. And Enoch Powell, and Tony Benn, and Jeremy Corbyn – and lots of others.

The 4 MPs disciplined yesterday usually are not essentially in the identical class as most of those figures, however some Labour MPs are sad on the precedent that has been set.

Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding, has been doing interviews this morning. She was meant to be speaking about measures introduced right this moment that the Dwelling Workplace says will imply “more women and children will be better protected from domestic abuse through the direct targeting of perpetrators”, however inevitably she ended up defending the choice taken yesterday.

All 4 MPs suspended voted in opposition to the federal government’s welfare invoice, even after the federal government introduced two units of main concessions, and one in every of them, Rachael Maskell, ended up main the opposition on the day of the ultimate vote. However Phillips claimed the 4 weren’t being punished for his or her opposition to the cuts in illness and incapacity advantages. She instructed the At the moment programme:

I don’t suppose that the self-discipline that has been meted out during the last 24 hours is linked to [the welfare bill] as a result of many extra individuals voted in opposition to the federal government than these 4 individuals.

However when requested why they had been being disciplined, Phillips claimed to not know the total story. Requested what the explanations had been for the MPs being suspended, she replied:

I really don’t know as a result of I’m not a part of the disciplining workforce.

However “a level of persistence” was most likely an element, she mentioned.

And she or he mentioned self-discipline was necessary.

The fact is there needs to be a component of self-discipline, in any other case, you find yourself not having the ability to govern.

I’m a plain speaker and I’ll let you know that I disagree typically with instructions which can be happening, and I spend time working with colleagues, each on the front and back benches, guaranteeing that we focus on these issues.

I believe that continuously taking to the airwaves and slagging off your individual authorities, I’ve to say, what did you suppose was going to occur?

Right here is the agenda for the day.

10.30am: Keir Starmer is because of launch a Civil Society Covenant at an occasion in London.

11.30am: Downing Avenue holds a foyer briefing.

Lunchtime: Starmer welcomes Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, to Downing Avenue.

Afternoon: Starmer and Merz go to a manufacturing facility in Hertfordshire, the place they may communicate to the media.

Round 4pm: Wes Streeting, well being secretary, holds a gathering with the BMA’s resident medical doctors committee.

If you wish to contact me, please put up a message under the road when feedback are open (usually between 10am and 3pm in the intervening time), or message me on social media. I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however when you put “Andrew” in a message geared toward me, I’m extra prone to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.

If you wish to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. You’ll be able to attain me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, however particular person Guardian journalists are there, I nonetheless have my account, and when you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I’ll see it and reply if vital.

I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos. No error is just too small to right. And I discover your questions very fascinating too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or generally within the weblog.