Shark vs. Roomba: Evaluating top-rated robotic vacuum lineups

The dialog surrounding the finest robotic vacuums is a multi-faceted one through which 4 or 5 manufacturers have a phrase at any given second, fluctuating only a few months as somebody releases yet one more new mannequin. However whatever the stiff competitors that the Roborocks and Eufys of the world proceed to pose, the Shark vs. Roomba debate is perpetually a heated one — exemplified when even a generic search of “robot vacuum” on Google triggers the “People also ask” field to populate with “Is Shark or iRobot better?”

Cementing a definitive reply on the higher robotic vacuum model is difficult when “better” is a subjective time period swayed by what a client wants their robotic vacuum to excel at. Some might contemplate the higher robotic vacuum to have extra superior navigation that results in much less babysitting, whereas others might classify the one which squeezes out a sufficiently thorough clear for much less cash as the higher worth.

The brand new 2025 Roombas simply modified all the things

This could have been a really completely different article to learn had you stopped by any time earlier than March 2025. Earlier than then, iRobot and Shark had been each form of plateauing by way of the number of their respective lineups. It was like a contest to see who may very well be probably the most mid — particularly in comparison with the robotic vacuums introduced at CES.

However the lukewarm rivalry acquired fascinating when iRobot went rogue and overhauled the entire Roomba fleet outdoors of its typical schedule (the corporate had beforehand been saving its massive product drops for late summer time). The brand new batch consists of eight new Roombas falling below 4 completely different umbrellas: the Roomba 105 or 205, or Roomba Plus 405 or 505, ranging in value from $299 to $999. (This will or might not be a final ditch effort to avoid wasting the corporate from a reportedly bleak monetary scenario.)

These Roombas are so new that I have never gotten to check them out at dwelling but. However simply based mostly off of descriptions and costs, iRobot appears to have patched up a number of weak spots within the lineup and prioritized price range friendliness with out skimping on options that buyers actually care about, like good mapping in even the most cost effective fashions.

And up till iRobot’s March 2025 announcement, neither iRobot nor Shark measured suction energy in Pascals (Pa) like most of their opponents do. iRobot lastly made the change, however Shark nonetheless insists on preserving an charisma by solely evaluating suction energy to different vacuums in its family tree. (That is what iRobot was doing with its older fashions, too.) Shark has additionally been identified to make claims like “50% better suction than the best-selling iRobot. Whatever that means — the weakest Roomba is probably technically one of its best sellers.

Where iRobot and Shark agree: Being weird about suction power disclosure

Pinning down whether iRobot or Shark robot vacuums are stronger is always a challenge, and not just because each offers multiple different vacs with different levels of power at different prices. The two longstanding brands aren’t keen on using the standard unit of Pascals (Pa) to measure suction power like the Roborock and Eufys of the world are — an effort that could only be perceived as a secret pact to make my life as a robot vacuum reviewer more difficult than it needs to be.

Instead, both Shark and iRobot like to keep their suction power comparisons within their own families. For instance, they might say a new model offers “x instances the suction energy” that an older or more basic model of theirs does. iRobot did originally float the idea of switching over to Pa with its March 2025 releases, but actual Pa numbers are still hard to track down online.

Where Roomba wins: Small obstacle avoidance and more models to fit more needs

iRobot simply has more robot vacuums, and that variety alone gives it a leg up on Shark. More models to choose from means more opportunities to customize the features and budget to a shopper’s main goals for automated cleaning.

Let’s say you’re willing to pay a little extra for a premium robot vacuum that achieves the most hands-off experience possible. iRobot has several options with features that make a robot vacuum increasingly self-sufficient, including mopping pads that automatically lift over carpet, self-empty docks that also wash and dry the mopping pads, and small obstacle avoidance cameras.

However ground kind is much from probably the most spectacular factor the smarter Roombas acknowledge. All j collection Roombas, the Roomba Combo 10 Max, and the Roomba Plus 505 Combo all have small impediment avoidance expertise, which solves the principle gripe that many robotic vacuum non-believers have: robotic vacuums get caught so typically that they are extra hassle than they’re price. These Roombas use a particular digicam system to assist them acknowledge and keep away from small obstacles that less-advanced robotic vacuums would usually eat, like a telephone charger, extension twine, rogue sock, or pet waste.

I first skilled this sense of reduction when reviewing the Roomba j7+ and Combo j7+, and it was by no means simple to get again into the behavior of pre-tidying when attempting one other robotic vacuum that did not have that. I might simply sacrifice extra intense cleansing for a robotic vacuum to have the mind cells to do this.

One of many coolest elements in regards to the Roomba lineup is that you could combine and match a number of of those options to remain inside a sure price range. You may skip all the different fancy options whereas nonetheless bringing dwelling small impediment avoidance with the standalone Roomba j7 for as little as $299 on sale, or check out the space-saving DustCompactor design with or with out mopping for below $500. Even the most cost effective 2025 Roombas assure LiDAR-powered good mapping and 70 instances (learn that once more) the suction energy of the 600 collection Roombas, which had been the go-to base tier Roombas two years in the past.

I might identical to to say that I principally referred to as iRobot’s most up-to-date transfer in an older model of this piece from spring 2024, saying that “iRobot would also be wise to drop a more budget-friendly option with carpet-centric suction power.” Folks sticking to a sure price range should not inherently should accept a rinky-dink cleaner, and iRobot lastly realized that that is the piece that was lacking in its entry-level tier.

The place Roomba loses: The ultra-affordable finish of the spectrum

Plummeting earnings one month, a random revamp of all the Roomba line the subsequent month — if we’re attempting to learn between the strains, I might say it grew to become obviously apparent that folks had been getting sick of Roombas costing loads however not doing sufficient.

Whereas the 2025 Roomba releases do present that iRobot is pandering to the value-minded crowd tougher than ever earlier than, the cost-per-feature scenario continues to be stiff within the $400-and-under class. Is it too overpriced, too late for iRobot?

For example, I feel that the proper starter robotic vacuum is one with good mapping and self-emptying — suction may be fairly fundamental. In Roomba world, the most cost effective choice for that is the Roomba 105 + AutoEmpty Dock, going for $449.99. In Shark world, the identical capabilities may be secured for $329 at full value.

Then, iRobot’s $200 to $300 assortment is sort of comically Not Price It. In April 2024, iRobot fumbled a low-hanging alternative to proper the disappointments of its price range part. Admittedly, the $249.99 Vac Important, $274.99 mopping Roomba Combo Important, and barely dearer self-emptying variations do present a extra highly effective clear than the older 600 collection. However the low-cost Roomba’s deadly flaw stays: they nonetheless haven’t got good mapping, a function I really feel is ~Important~ in any robotic vacuum. A handful of Sharks on the similar costs with comparable suction energy do good map.

Certain, all of those base-tier Roombas do go on sale typically. You can technically rating absolutely the least expensive Roomba for round $130 or a mopping, self-emptying Roomba for $280. However settling for no particular room cleansing simply is not price it, particularly when the same wad of money may get you manner additional in case you had been shopping for a Shark (or a Eufy or a Dreame mannequin).

In my expertise, simply hitting “go” and letting a robotic vacuum clear aimlessly is a recipe for coming dwelling to a robotic vacuum misplaced below the mattress. The zigzag sample seems like a hit-or-miss guessing sport made extra annoying by getting caught and lacking spots on the ground that I might slightly simply hit with my Dyson stick vacuum, anyway.

The place Shark wins: Spot cleansing and affordability

Shark has been way more in tune with what the typical individual is keen to spend on a robotic vacuum. The model constantly gives core capabilities like good mapping and mopping at decrease costs than its Roomba counterparts — a stage of cost-effectiveness that ought to be notably attractive to strict price range customers or first-time robotic vacuum homeowners.

Shark’s extra approachable value factors do not essentially imply it skimps on cleansing efficiency, although.

I’ve each my beloved cordless Dyson and, for Mashable testing functions, no less than one robotic vacuum at my fingertips always. I get a real sense of any given robotic vacuum’s worth when an surprising mess inside a room in my condo must be taken care of proper now. So my favourite factor that I’ve seen about Shark robotic vacuums is that they make spot cleansing simpler than Roombas do. Whereas the iRobot app insists that you simply create and identify an official cleansing zone, even when it is a one-time factor, Shark helps you to skip the labeling charade to tug and drop a sq. in your map within the designated spot cleansing tab. It is only one step, however there’s one thing to be mentioned for streamlining.

Shark additionally will get a bit extra nitty gritty with the spot cleansing itself. This all began with its Matrix line from 2023, which launched Matrix mode. These Sharks clear in a grid sample, approaching the world a number of instances from a number of angles to seize something it could have missed within the first cross or two. iRobot and Shark can duke it out over suction energy on paper all they need, however in my testing, I discovered the low and mid-range Shark fashions (just like the Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 and Shark Detect Professional) to be a lot much less prone to go away a rogue crumb or pile of hair behind than the 600 collection, Important collection, and lower-end j collection Roombas.

Throughout common vacuuming, Sharks in Matrix mode dish out 30 p.c higher carpet cleansing than the older RV Shark fashions. For the 2-in-1 Shark fashions, Matrix mode additionally works with mopping when the mopping pad vibrates 100 instances per minute to wash at stains that will doubtless not budge when wiped with a stationary material. Matrix mopping got here in clutch for maintaining with the fixed layer of shoe prints by my entrance door.

Shark even extends the Matrix cleansing mechanism to its least expensive robotic vacuum, making it one among our favourite — if not the favourite — budget-friendly robotic vacuums in 2024. The Shark RV2310 and Walmart-exclusive Shark Matrix RV2300 and RV2300S are extremely dependable robotic vacuums for the value, typically on sale for $199.99 for the standalone model and $299.99 for the self-emptying model. (If this mannequin is offered and shipped by a 3rd occasion slightly than Walmart whenever you click on, we would advise ready till extra inventory from Shark itself is available in.)

I skilled no noteworthy points with navigational accuracy when sending the Shark RV2300 to particularly sweep my rest room or Matrix clear the ground surrounding the kitchen counter, which is an space I dragged and dropped within the app on a case-by-case foundation. Although the suction energy is expectedly simply OK, it was sufficient for surface-level every day repairs of the large, seen particles.

In September 2024, Shark lastly caught on to the entire “self-sustaining mopping pads” factor with the discharge of the Shark PowerDetect line. And naturally, even probably the most premium Sharks debuted at $1,199.99 and $999.99 — a number of hundred lower than the Roomba with self-washing and drying mopping pads (on the time).

That is the primary mopping Shark that is aware of to cease mopping on carpeted areas with out you having to particularly designate so. For good measure, the PowerDetect can also be outfitted with massive wheels that hoist the vac over carpet to maintain it dry throughout mopping mode. These hydraulics additionally helped the PowerDetect to be one of many solely robotic vacs I’ve examined to not swirl my bathtub rugs up each single time.

The place Shark loses: Small impediment avoidance

Shark’s shortcomings stem from sparseness in its household tree and a protracted wait interval between product drops that usually have it taking part in meet up with different manufacturers. The present Shark fashions are additionally just a little extra fundamental than among the Roombas, particularly mid-tier ones.

For example, the one massive factor Shark was lacking perpetually was a premium hybrid robotic vacuum that would wash and dry its personal mopping pads. That hole was lastly closed when Shark launched the Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Professional in September 2024. However small impediment avoidance is the opposite premium robotic vac function that is come to easily be anticipated in vacs close to the $1,000 level, and Shark’s NeverStuck expertise nonetheless hasn’t mastered it but. A handful of Roombas, most of them moderately priced (no less than when on sale), do test the small impediment avoidance field.

Which means issues like cords, pet toys, laundry, and slippers aren’t actually on a Shark vac’s radar but. And it’s a must to be round to clear the ground of these earlier than sending a Shark out. Possibly you do not thoughts that, possibly you do — relying on how critically you are taking the hands-off method in your robotic vacuum search.

One Roomba counterpart, the $649.99 (or $499 on sale) Roomba Combo j5+, additionally self-empties, mops, and maps, and does the final half with small impediment avoidance in-built to tackle a job even when the ground is just a little chaotic. In comparison with the opposite fundamental manufacturers like iRobot, Roborock, Eufy, and Dreame, who all have a couple of botvac with small impediment avoidance tech, it would not damage Shark to prioritize small impediment avoidance throughout a number of fashions in its subsequent product drop.

Equally, just one hybrid Sharks robotically stops mopping when carpet is sensed. This implies vacuum and mop mode aren’t attainable on the similar time within the different 2-in-1 Shark Matrix fashions, and an individual must manually connect the water tank to modify to mopping mode. With Matrix Mopping being such a strong function, it is a bummer that it could’t be deployed extra freely.

Although I used to be happy with the ground protection, thoroughness, and mapping accuracy when testing the $599.99 Shark Detect Professional, it appears overpriced for the negligible variations between it and a daily previous self-emptying Shark. “Detect” sounds prefer it ought to seek advice from the potential to detect telephone chargers or socks, however alas, it is really speaking a couple of function that will increase suction when an edge, nook, or additional soiled spot is detected. That is good, however heightened nook protection is not main sufficient to justify $600, particularly when there are a number of Roombas on this value vary that additionally work tougher on dirtier spots, in addition to mop and keep away from small obstacles.

Our winner

Roomba

After years of struggling for relevancy within the booming robotic vacuum market, Shark is lastly a viable Roomba contender with its value-packed Matrix line. Roomba positive as hell is not standing nonetheless both, although, and each manufacturers are at some extent the place they provide a number of strong choices that excel at no less than one bullet level of the function trifecta that makes a robotic vacuum worthwhile in 2025 (previous the precise cleansing efficiency itself): self-emptying, good mapping, and mopping.

That is the place their overlap ends. Each Shark and Roomba nonetheless have blind spots, simply on opposing ends of the spectrum of value and superior (or not) options. That is the place your private cleansing wants and price range will come into play.

Shark unequivocally packs extra worth into the budget-friendly finish of the spectrum. All of its Matrix robotic vacuums have good mapping and might enter Matrix cleansing mode, which entails vacuuming or scrubbing in a crosshatch sample over a number of passes. It is a notably dependable function throughout spot cleansing, and customarily gives extra thoroughness than the similarly-priced i Sequence Roombas. Plus, you possibly can virtually at all times discover one of many low-end Matrix fashions on sale for lower than $200.

A budget Roombas have not aged properly, and no Roomba that’ll go on sale for lower than $200 can map your property or clear as totally because the Matrix system.

However iRobot does make up for that oversight with its new 105, 205, 405, and 505 collection Roombas, in addition to its older j collection Roombas. Ranging between $299 (on sale) and $999 (on sale), all j Sequence Roombas can keep away from small obstacles like cords and pet waste. Two of those j Sequence Roombas push the hands-off expertise even additional with a built-in mopping arm that by no means must be eliminated or connected. The brand new Roombas from 2025 cowl a ton of floor within the $400 to $1,000 vary, providing a wider vary for folk to customise their buy with the robotic vacuum options they care about.

All professionals and cons thought-about, we’re nonetheless crowning iRobot as the higher robotic vacuum model for most individuals. There’s merely a much bigger number of Roombas to select from, which permits for customizing your robotic vacuum buy to your price range and cleansing priorities with out settling.

Whereas Shark does do extra below a sure value level, small impediment avoidance — and presumably, much less babysitting — will likely be main for the robotic vacuum skeptics who want a bot that is actually autonomous for it to appear worthwhile.