Scott Peterson’s Spouse’s Time of Loss of life Proves Innocence, Nancy Grace Scoffs

Scott Peterson ought to get a brand new trial proving he couldn’t have dedicated the murders due to new scientific proof — so claims The Innocence Challenge — however Nancy Grace says the so-called “scientific evidence” is a load of crap.

Nancy appeared on the brand new episode of the “2 Offended Males“ podcast and addressed a brand new principle that may have made it inconceivable for Scott Peterson — who’s serving a life sentence for the murders of Laci and their unborn baby, Conner — to have dedicated the crime.

The Innocence Challenge says primarily based on scientific expertise that was not out there when Peterson was tried again in 2004, fetal testing places the date of dying someplace between December 28, 2002 and January 5, 2003.

Prosecutors put the date of dying at December 24, 2002, the identical day Laci went lacking. Brief story — Scott was already underneath the police microscope by December twenty eighth, so he could not have dedicated the murders throughout that new timeframe.

Nancy was not having it … first making it clear she has expertise that Harvey and Mark do not have — childbirth. She was additionally indignant these new-fangled scientists felt they knew greater than Laci’s OB-GYN.

Nancy additionally talks about her new e-book — “What Happened to Ellen?: An American Miscarriage of Justice” — in regards to the dying of Ellen Greenberg, and she or he has a factor or 2 to say in regards to the Menendez brothers’ bid for freedom.