R. Kelly is asking the US Supreme Court docket to throw out his convictions for possession of kid porn and inducing minors to have intercourse – claiming his alleged acts occurred many years in the past and the fees have been subsequently barred by the statute of limitations.
This is the deal … when R. Kelly was accused in 2020 of possessing baby pornography and interesting in sexual acts with underage women method again within the mid to late-Nineties, he argued the statute of limitations had already run its course.
However, prosecutors argued a 2003 regulation – referred to as the PROTECT Act – made the statute of limitations indefinite for baby intercourse crimes.
Principally, Kelly’s legal professional, Jennifer Bonjean, argues that as a result of the conduct for which Kelly’s now serving time occurred within the ’90s however the PROTECT Act wasn’t handed till 2003, the Act’s expanded statute of limitations would not apply to the fees in opposition to him.
The PROTECT Act extends the statute of limitations indefinitely for alleged crimes dedicated AFTER the regulation went into impact in 2003, however Congress particularly did not embrace a clause permitting the regulation to be utilized to alleged conduct dedicated BEFORE 2003.
You may recall, Kelly was convicted of six of 13 counts again in 2020 — three for baby pornography and three for inducement counts.
AUGUST 2023
TMZ.com
He obtained a 20-year sentence and was ordered to pay a whole lot of 1000’s of {dollars} in damages to his alleged victims.
The Supreme Court docket will determine within the subsequent few months whether or not to listen to Kelly’s attraction.
