Minister rejects declare that Sue Grey confirmed ‘stunning arrogance’ accepting larger wage than Keir Starmer – UK politics stay

As talked about earlier, Chris Mason, who because the BBC’s political editor does one of many hardest jobs in journalism, has written a weblog about how and why he and colleagues ending up breaking the story about Sue Grey’s wage. He says he was first instructed the data by a authorities insider on Sunday – “I had not gone looking for this information, it found me” – and that over the following two days they have been capable of confirm and corroborate what he had been instructed. On why it issues, he says:

This story, at its crux, just isn’t about [Gray’s] wage per se.

It’s concerning the ranges of upset and anger – truthful or in any other case – about her and her function on the high of presidency.

That’s what motivated the one that tipped me off – at appreciable skilled danger – to inform me what I’m now telling you.

And I do know from different conversations I’ve had – and members of our BBC crew have had – that this particular person is much from alone.

And that tells you one thing concerning the fractious relationships amongst some on the high of presidency, lower than three months after Labour gained the election.

In his interviews this morning Jonathan Reynolds, the enterprise secretary, defended Keir Starmer over his document of accepting freebies.

On Monday the Guardian reported that “Starmer has declared more free tickets and gifts than other major party leaders in recent times, with his total now topping £100,000”. Sky Information has additionally produced its personal model of this story, with figures exhibiting how Starmer compares with different MPs who’ve accepted many items.

Referring to Starmer accepting tickets for occasions like soccer matches and live shows, Reynolds mentioned that politicians doing jobs that concerned working lengthy hours wanted some rest. Talking on Occasions Radio, he mentioned:

There’s at all times going to be the case the place individuals in public life are invited to sure occasions. I can inform you having been a secretary of state for 2 months, just about each working hour of it’s spent working. And if individuals get the possibility for just a little little bit of rest as a part of that, once more, I’ve no drawback or objection to that.

When the presenter, Aasmah Mir, put it to Reynolds that he appeared to be saying these freebies have been “a perk of the job”, Reynolds argued politicians accepted tickets to occasions like this so they may “engage” with individuals.

It’s not a perk of the job, it’s a part of the job. Individuals need to interact with resolution makers. They need to ask you to concentrate on what they’re doing. Once more, I feel now we have the best guidelines on transparency in relation to that. However that is concerning the job that we do and the must be engaged with the sectors that we cowl.

And he made the identical argument on Sky Information, the place he was requested particularly about Starmer accepting tickets for a Taylor Swift live performance. Reynolds mentioned:

I feel these are main cultural, sporting occasions. I feel it’s vital individuals in public life have some connection to that, that they’re conscious of that. After all, going to see Taylor Swift – I’ve by no means seen her myself, however I hear it’s a really important and beautiful expertise to take action.

However, once more, so long as these issues are declared brazenly, transparently, in accordance with the principles, there’s no objection on my half to that.

Good morning. Yesterday the BBC broke the story that Sue Grey, Keir Starmer’s chief of workers, is paid £170,000 a yr, which is about £3,000 a yr greater than the PM himself. It’s not a typical BBC story (extra on that later), and it might be a traditional prosecution exhibit for anybody arguing that political journalists are too obsessive about insider processology. There may be additionally a robust argument that ministers and officers on the very high of politics are paid comparatively little anyway in case you bear in mind the talent set required, the hours labored, and what they may earn within the personal sector.

Sure, as Chris Mason, the BBC’s political editor has argued in a weblog concerning the story, that is greater than only a slice of Whitehall trivia. That’s as a result of the story suggests critical feuding is going on inside the Labour adviser machine in authorities. A narrative like this could not have ended up on the BBC with out somebody fairly vital briefing viciously in opposition to Grey, and the revelation has angered different particular advisers who declare that Grey is in charge for them being supplied measly salaries, no less than in comparison with what their Tory predecessors have been on, or what they have been incomes once they have been paid by the Labour celebration.

So what, you may suppose. A couple of dozen particular advisers most individuals have by no means heard of need to be paid extra. Don’t all of us? That may find yourself as being the suitable response to the story. But when this row means No 10 can’t perform correctly as a result of the PM’s most senior political adviser is simply too divisive, it is going to matter.

Jonathan Reynolds, the enterprise secretary, has been doing a media spherical this morning, and, in an interview with Kay Burley on Sky Information, he rejected her suggestion that Grey’s resolution to just accept extra pay than the PM demonstrated her “stunning arrogance”. When this was put to him, Reynolds replied:

Clearly this an vital job.

There’s a course of that units these paybands. It should mirror earlier expertise … It’s a long-established manner of building inside sure pay bands renumeration regarding the job that you simply do. That’s what have been adopted on this case.

The unique BBC story included a quote from a supply saying it was put to Grey that she may need to settle for a small lower so she earned lower than the PM, and that she declined. Authorities sources are saying that’s “categorically untrue”.

Reynolds additionally instructed Starmer himself didn’t resolve Grey’s pay. He mentioned:

I feel it’s vital individuals perceive that the pay bands for any official, any adviser, aren’t set by politicians. There’s an official course of that does that. I don’t, as an illustration, get to set the pay for my very own advisers who work straight for me. So, there’s a course of, we don’t have political enter into that.

The choice to extend the highest wage out there to particular advisers in No 10, in comparison with what it was earlier than the election, was taken by a committee of officers. However, in response to the BBC story, Starmer signed off its resolution.

When it was put to Reynolds that this was hypocritical given the truth that Starmer criticised Dominic Cummings getting a giant pay rise when he was Boris Johnson’s chief adviser, Reynolds ignored this level and simply replied:

There’s a course of that units this stuff. It’s extensively recognised. It’s long-standing. It hasn’t modified and that’s how pay bands are set for any adviser.

There will probably be extra on this because the morning goes on – not least as a result of there may be not a lot else within the diary. In truth, the principle information is prone to come late afternoon. Starmer is doing a marathon sequence of interviews with regional TV editors (26 of them, in response to Politico), however their contents are embargoed till 5pm.

If you wish to contact me, please submit a message under the road (BTL) or message me on social media. I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however in case you put “Andrew” in a message aimed toward me, I’m extra prone to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase.

If you wish to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of social media. I’m nonetheless utilizing X and I’ll see one thing addressed to @AndrewSparrow in a short time. I’m additionally attempting Bluesky (@andrewsparrowgdn) and Threads (@andrewsparrowtheguardian).

I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos (no error is simply too small to right). And I discover your questions very attention-grabbing too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or typically within the weblog.