Campaigning for his third time period as president in 2022, Lula da Silva ran on a simple message: making Brazil “happy again”. Now, midway by means of his third time period, macroeconomic indicators paint a reasonably rosy image of the nation’s trajectory underneath his administration: GDP progress exceeded expectations, and the unemployment price fell to historic ranges. On the worldwide stage, the president is well known as a number one voice towards the authoritarianism and neo-imperialist aspirations of Donald Trump. But at dwelling, Lula’s reputation is declining.
As Lula 3.0’s second half unfolds, limitations within the Staff’ Celebration mannequin persist. After recovering from a coup try on 8 January 2023, lower than every week earlier than the inauguration, the brand new authorities swiftly restored or enhanced among the Staff’ Celebration’s flagship social packages that had been weakened underneath Jair Bolsonaro, equivalent to Bolsa Família (money transfers to poor households), Minha Casa Minha Vida (building and financing of reasonably priced housing items), and Mais Médicos (provision of physicians in weak areas). Nevertheless, the primary months of the administration, again in 2023, confirmed that the varied packages’ longevity can be contingent on increasing their funding supply: state income.
Lula guess on a Keynesian components that sought to spice up demand by means of elevated state intervention and funding – a key characteristic of his earlier administrations. In August 2023, the federal government set in movement a brand new iteration of the Programa de Aceleração do Crescimento (Progress Acceleration Program), aimed toward giant infrastructure initiatives in a number of areas, together with transportation, inexperienced power and digital transition. In January 2024, a brand new industrial coverage was launched to foster technological innovation and strengthen home industries. Nevertheless, whereas funding charges grew an amazing deal from 2023 to 2024, on the present 17.6 p.c, they’re nonetheless significantly down from the common 20 p.c achieved from 2008 to 2013, throughout Lula’s second presidency and the primary Rousseff years. With out the enlargement of such charges and, therefore, the assure of long-term progress and better income, Lula and the broader Staff’ Celebration undertaking is compromised.
One can argue that modifications within the worldwide state of affairs, notably post-pandemic combined tendencies in commodity costs, constrain what Lula 3.0 can ship. Nevertheless, the federal government’s personal fiscal strategy needs to be thought of the principle hindrance. The Novo Arcabouço Fiscal (New Fiscal Framework), championed by Minister of Finance Fernando Haddad, presents itself as a extra versatile different to inflexible fiscal targets however in the end reinforces a restrictive logic that prioritizes debt management over social funding. By tying spending to financial efficiency and capping expenditures even in intervals of prosperity, the framework limits the federal government’s capability to answer urgent social wants, spend money on long-term transformations, and tackle structural points that perpetuate inequality. The federal government, and the minister specifically, justifies these selections as pragmatism, disguising an austerity rationale as fiscal accountability.
Foto: Ricardo Stuckert / Lula Official. Supply: Wikimedia Commons
The Staff’ Celebration by no means sidelined considerations with balanced budgets in earlier administrations, however Lula 3.0 has escalated this precedence, as attested by the set of measures to “enhance fiscal responsibility” permitted on the finish of 2024. Key elements embody cuts to schooling funds and a cap on above-inflation raises to the minimal wage. The latter influences different expenditures, together with unemployment and social safety advantages, together with stricter eligibility standards for social packages, equivalent to incapacity advantages and Bolsa Família. The progressive social funding measures the federal government has introduced – equivalent to tax exemptions for people incomes as much as 5,000 reais per thirty days and a super-rich tax, aimed toward unique and off-shore funding funds – pale when put next with the federal government’s defence of fiscal conservatism.
The battle between concentrating on inequality by means of public spending and following the dictates of the market leaves Lula 3.0 with no choice however to additional guess on agribusiness and mining with a purpose to generate much-needed revenues and stop critical financial destabilization within the close to future. Take, as an illustration, the current proposal to discover oil and fuel deposits close to the mouth of the Amazon River by Petrobras, the nationwide petroleum firm, a prospect criticized by the federal government’s personal federal environmental company.
With out progressive structural transformation, Lula 3.0 won’t be able to maneuver the Brazilian financial system away from neo-extractivism, as left-wing critics of earlier Staff’ Celebration administrations have identified. And moreover producing contradictions from an environmental perspective, some extent strongly highlighted by Indigenous activists in Brazil, the neo-extractive lure reinforces the dependent nature of the Brazilian financial system – its continued reliance on exporting uncooked supplies and low-value items to wealthier international locations, slightly than creating a diversified industrial base – and leaves little leverage to push again towards the brand new Trump administration.
*
Lula’s third presidency also needs to be assessed by way of the institutional leverage the proper wing at present holds. Brazil’s multiparty political system has at all times required the making of alliances to construct majorities in each the Home and the Senate, pushing the coalition in energy into negotiations throughout the political spectrum. Those that sided with Lula within the newest run knew his new presidency would face challenges within the parliament due to the election of a extra sizable far right-wing cohort to Congress, which might compel the president to achieve out past the coalition that led to his victory, towards centre-to-right and historically right-wing forces that had merged with bolsonarismo. Initially of his third time period, Lula granted a few of Bolsonaro’s previous allies cupboard seats in trade for help for the federal government’s proposals and conceded to right-wing forces in public security and the army. For instance, Lula assigned José Múcio, a favourite among the many armed forces, the place of Minister of Defence.
Nevertheless, Bolsonaro-era modifications to the administration of the federal finances, which allowed lawmakers to allocate parts of presidency funds at their discretion, have disrupted the stability between govt and legislative energy. Regardless of Brazil’s supreme courtroom having dominated Bolsonaro’s slush fund unlawful, lawmakers are not depending on the administration for entry to authorities spoils and have little incentive to cooperate with it. The broad right-wing bloc has exploited this dynamic to exert strain from each instructions – demanding deeper austerity measures whereas concurrently blaming the administration for the hurt these very insurance policies could inflict on the nation.
The explanation the harm isn’t larger for Lula 3.0 is as a result of the proper wing is at present in dysfunction. Bolsonaro stays the central reference for the conservative mass motion consolidated along with his election in 2018, however the demonstrations in his help are shrinking and his authorized troubles have significantly worsened, since he’s now indicted on the January 8 costs by the Supreme Court docket; the potential of arrest following a trial within the fall is actual. On the similar time, no different right-wing character has been in a position to declare themselves because the inheritor of bolsonarismo but. A number of names, equivalent to Bolsonaro’s spouse Michelle, the São Paulo governor Tarcísio de Freitas, and Minas Gerais, the governor Romeu Zema, have been floated as options. The long run is unclear.
Such dynamics marked the nationwide municipal elections that unfolded in October and November final 12 months. The Proper received 78 p.c of the disputed seats (or roughly 4,300 municipalities) in a single spherical; the Left was overwhelmed in many of the 52 main cities the place its candidates competed within the second spherical, underneath the runoff format, and its mayoralties fell from 863 to 752 for the reason that earlier elections, in 2020. Certainly, most second-round runoffs pitted centre-right to far-right views towards each other, successfully excluding a progressive dialog altogether.
The case of São Paulo – the nation’s largest metropolis – is especially noteworthy. After a robust exhibiting in 2020, housing motion chief and Lula-endorsed candidate Guilherme Boulos was well-positioned to problem conservative incumbent mayor Ricardo Nunes. Nevertheless, an sudden third contender, web superstar coach Pablo Marçal, got here only a few thousand votes near advancing to the second spherical. Working an aggressive marketing campaign towards the “establishment”, Marçal was in a position to (re)energize a broad working-class and middle-class base towards “wokeness” and for a pro-market agenda. His efficiency is a testomony to the power of the far proper and its present capability to impress individuals and form the talk within the nation. Boulos couldn’t match the combative strategy Marçal delivered to the dispute and will acquire no additional floor for the Left. In the meantime, Marçal’s failure to advance to the second spherical and Nunes’s wrestle to unify the proper from the onset replicate divisions nonetheless to be bridged by conservatives within the months to come back.
Regardless of these fractures, the Proper’s narrative capability stays robust, due to the web militia consolidated within the years of Bolsonaro’s administration. Lula 3.0 has confronted a decentralized but extremely coordinated effort to unfold misinformation and foster conservative and market-friendly values within the nation. When the state of Rio Grande do Sul was destroyed by means of file rainfall and flooding in 2024, rumors that the federal government was unable to answer the catastrophe and had even deserted the inhabitants flooded social media and WhatsApp and Telegram channels, swaying anxieties in regards to the tragedy towards anti-state sentiment. In early 2025, the federal government revoked a call to watch a real-time cost system that enables immediate transfers between financial institution accounts, following right-wing on-line allegations that the choice was meant to additional tax working individuals, notably these within the gig and repair industries.
This on-line militia not solely spreads misinformation but additionally serves as an ideological incubator, systematically nurturing radicalization by means of a continuing stream of memes, edited movies, and broadcasts framing authoritarian actions as righteous resistance. When Brazilian authorities arrested a number of members of an elite military unit in November 2024 for 2022 plot to assassinate then-president-elect Lula, his choose for vp, Geraldo Alckmin, and Justice Alexandre de Moraes, whose choices have hindered the bolsonarista motion, a web based echo chamber amplified conspiratorial narratives, justified political violence, and forged the perpetrators as patriots resisting a corrupt and illegitimate regime. Following the January 8 riot, these similar digital platforms rapidly shifted gears to attract decontextualized comparisons with left-wing demonstrations, downplaying the gravity of the assault on democracy.
*
On this context, Lula’s declining reputation ought to come as no shock. Approval rankings have dropped throughout all areas, and whereas Lula 3.0 has managed to stabilize the financial system and restore some key social packages, these good points stay fragile underneath the load of fiscal conservatism, an uncooperative legislature, and a political atmosphere saturated by disinformation. The fitting-wing opposition has maintained its grip on the general public creativeness by means of a potent mixture of narrative warfare and institutional leverage. In the meantime, Eduardo Bolsonaro, now residing within the US, works to develop transnational alliances able to making use of exterior strain on Brazil’s political discipline, outsourcing the harassment of political opponents to worldwide companions.
Lula’s third time period is formed by a profound incongruity: whereas the Left holds the manager, it governs from a defensive place, making repeated concessions to market and conservative forces in hopes of sustaining governance. The price of this technique is excessive: It demobilizes the favored front-style alliance that introduced Lula to the presidency for the third time, erodes the administration’s transformative capability, and leaves the broader Left weak to the Proper’s relentless ideological advance. For liberals and progressives worldwide, Lula’s predicament gives a lesson. Ceding floor to the proper wing doesn’t guarantee stability and will speed up backsliding. The problem is to withstand the false safety of moderation.
If Lula 3.0 is to depart a legacy past mere harm management, it is going to require a political recalibration – one which reclaims the initiative, reinvests in fashionable group, and confronts head-on the structural constraints that at present dictate the phrases of progressive governance in Brazil. With out such a shift, the administration dangers turning into a tragic case research within the limits of left-wing energy underneath right-wing hegemony.
