The Australian authorities’s “hero” homecoming for Julian Assange was political “grandstanding” and minimises respectable considerations in regards to the impression of his actions with WikiLeaks, in accordance with a former senior bureaucrat and Asio chief who served as ambassador to the USA.
Dennis Richardson stated the prime minister’s telephone name to Assange when he landed in Australia on Wednesday evening was inappropriate, provided that Assange had pleaded responsible to espionage in respectable US authorized proceedings.
“I can think of no other reason why a prime minister would ring Assange on his return to Australia except for purposes relating to politics,” Richardson informed Guardian Australia on Friday, calling the transfer “extraordinary”.
He advised the federal government ought to make clear its place on whether or not what Assange did was inappropriate, broken the nationwide curiosity and put lives in danger, as earlier successive governments have advised.
“If their views have changed, the government should say so,” he stated. “If the government’s views haven’t changed, then what are they doing returning Assange to Australia with some sort of hero status?”
At a information convention simply after Assange’s aircraft touched down, Anthony Albanese stated the federal government “feels strongly that the proper protection of all national security information is vital for safety”.
“But as I have said … there was nothing to be gained by the further incarceration of Mr Assange and we wanted him brought home,” he stated.
Richardson stated it was “extraordinarily unusual” if not “unprecedented” for an envoy and a excessive commissioner – on this case a former prime minister (Kevin Rudd) and a former international minister (Stephen Smith) – to accompany somebody convicted of such a criminal offense, besides in a jurisdiction the place “trumped-up” costs have been concerned.
“I cannot think of any logical reason for the ambassador in Washington and the high commissioner in London to accompany Assange, except for purposes of grandstanding and political presentation,” Richardson stated.
Guardian Australia understands it was a part of Assange’s British bail circumstances that Smith, the excessive commissioner to the UK, accompany him from Britain to the US territory of the North Mariana Islands. Rudd’s presence was added to present Assange additional assurance that he could be allowed to journey on to Australia.
The prime minister’s workplace had no remark.
The previous senior bureaucrat, who led the Division of Overseas Affairs and Commerce on the time WikiLeaks revealed an enormous trove of labeled US paperwork in 2010, praised these concerned find a decision to Assange’s case after he spent seven years within the Ecuadorian embassy in London to keep away from extradition to the US and an extra 5 years in London’s Belmarsh jail whereas he fought it by the courts.
That decision got here in a deal negotiated by the US Division of Justice, during which he pleaded responsible and was sentenced to time served. His legal professionals have emphasised that the decide who licensed the plea deal in a US court docket in Saipan, within the Mariana Islands, accepted there was no proof that WikiLeaks’ publication price lives.
“I think the government’s negotiation of a plea bargain was creative and I believe the government deserves congratulations on that front,” Richardson stated. However he didn’t lengthen that reward to how he returned residence.
after e-newsletter promotion
“If the government does believe what he did was inappropriate, if the government does believe what he did at the time put lives at risk, then what the hell were they thinking managing his return to Australia in the way that they did?”
Richardson pointed to the case of the previous Defence lawyer David McBride, convicted of leaking info that led to the publicity of alleged battle crimes in Afghanistan.
“Here you have McBride probably going to serve a prison sentence, while Assange has been in prison and he’s returned to Australia and almost celebrated by the government,” he stated. “That’s bizarre.”
Assange has not spoken since his return to Australian however his spouse, Stella, stated her husband had pleaded “guilty to committing journalism” and that his prosecution criminalised the “standard journalistic activity of news gathering and publishing”.
Richardson stated he revered the willpower of Assange’s household and authorized group.
However he rejected comparisons with the case of journalist Cheng Lei, who spent three years in a Chinese language jail falsely accused of spying and was met by the international minister, Penny Wong, on her return late final yr.
“That was a case involving trumped-up charges with no suggestion whatsoever that she had ever done anything which was damaging to Australia’s interests or allied interests,” Richardson stated. “A totally innocent person.”
His feedback come after the shadow international minister, Simon Birmingham, additionally condemned Albanese for telephoning Assange and for evaluating his launch to that of Cheng and one other former political prisoner, Sean Turnell, who was jailed in Myanmar.
