Conor McGregor did not maintain again Saturday morning … only a day after he was discovered chargeable for assault in his civil rape case in Eire.
CM first responded to an X submit from the Irish Impartial newspaper concerning the consequence of his case, which included the road, “Justice has been served.”
The MMA star replied, “Justice was served for James Lawrence, yes! Deplorable what they done. Nikita hand, vicious liar! APPEAL!”
James Lawrence, who Conor referenced, was additionally being accused of sexual assault … however the civil jury didn’t discover him liable.
It was after that preliminary X submit that Conor actually went off … going scorched earth in a prolonged social media rant.
Stated CM … “Two men falsely accused. One vindicated, the other soon to be! Congrats James Lawrence on absolute exoneration! Twice this heinous accusation was put to you and twice it was shown as FALSE! LIES!”
Conor went on … “It is absolutely disgraceful what they put you through here. Disgraceful! I look forward to seeing you further vindicate yourself and lambast those responsible in court! We know what happened that night! Everyone present knows, yet it was ignored. Every single statement of persons present on the night was ignored.”
He ended with, “On we fight! Justice and truth will prevail! Appeal! Appeal! Appeal! As well as other. Congrats James! Onwards and upwards! 🙏”
As TMZ reported … a jury discovered Conor liable for assault in his civil rape case that had been happening all month lengthy — after Nikita Ni Lamhain claimed McGregor and one other man had intercourse together with her towards her will after a 2018 Christmas get together.
CM and James adamantly denied the allegations … with the 36-year-old fighter claiming their encounter was fully consensual.
Jurors within the case clearly did not imagine Conor’s facet … and awarded Ni Lamhain roughly $250,000 in damages. Of their ruling, they did state they discovered that James did NOT assault the girl.
Conor advised us yesterday he was planning on interesting — including … “The judge’s instruction and the modest award given was for assault, there was not an award for aggravated or exemplary damages. I am disappointed that the jury did not hear all the evidence that the DPP reviewed.”
