Sunday, 11 May 2025
America Age
  • Trending
  • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Money
    • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion / Beauty
    • Art & Books
    • Culture
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Font ResizerAa
America AgeAmerica Age
Search
  • Trending
  • World
  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Money
    • Crypto & NFTs
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
    • Lifestyle
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Fashion / Beauty
    • Art & Books
    • Culture
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2024 America Age. All Rights Reserved.
America Age > Blog > Politics > Bannon ‘Decided He Was Above the Law,’ Prosecutor Says
Politics

Bannon ‘Decided He Was Above the Law,’ Prosecutor Says

Enspirers | Editorial Board
Share
Bannon ‘Decided He Was Above the Law,’ Prosecutor Says
SHARE

WASHINGTON — After weeks of legal wrangling and heated speeches on the courthouse steps, the criminal trial of Stephen K. Bannon, a onetime aide to former President Donald J. Trump, opened on Tuesday as prosecutors told the jury they would have to answer a simple question: Did Mr. Bannon defy the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by blatantly ignoring a subpoena?

Mr. Bannon, who left the White House in 2017, was indicted in November on two counts of contempt of Congress after he refused to comply with the committee’s formal demand for records and testimony concerning the Capitol riot. The filing of charges was widely seen at the time as a litmus test for whether the Justice Department would take an aggressive stance against one of Mr. Trump’s top allies as the House seeks to develop a fuller picture of the actions of the former president and his inner circle before and during the attack.

Prosecutors insisted that Mr. Bannon had clearly violated the law. “It wasn’t optional, it wasn’t a request and it wasn’t an invitation — it was mandatory,” Amanda Vaughn, a federal prosecutor, said of the subpoena Mr. Bannon ignored. “The defendant decided he was above the law and didn’t have to follow the government’s orders like his fellow citizens.”

“This whole case,” Ms. Vaughn went on, “is just about a guy that refused to show up.”

M. Evan Corcoran, a lawyer for the defense, countered the assertion that Mr. Bannon willfully ignored the subpoena, saying that the committee had not mandated him to comply.

“You’ll find from the evidence that the date on the subpoena was the subject of ongoing discussions and negotiations,” Mr. Corcoran said. “The dates on the subpoena were not fixed; they were flexible.”

Key Revelations From the Jan. 6 Hearings


Card 1 of 8

The defense also emphasized the political nature of the House committee and its members, urging jurors to consider whether the evidence to be presented during the trial was tainted by politics.

Throughout the proceedings, Mr. Bannon remained calmly seated, dressed in a black suit jacket and wearing a black mask.

The government’s first witness on Tuesday, Kristin Amerling, the deputy staff director and chief counsel to the Jan. 6 committee, outlined how the panel sought to provide a “complete account” of what happened on Jan. 6 and the importance of the subpoena as a fact-finding tool.

In the months after his indictment, Mr. Bannon raised a number of objections to the charges, seeking to get them dismissed before the trial began and hinting at defenses he intended to make before a jury.

At first he argued that he had disregarded the subpoena on the advice of his lawyer and therefore should not face criminal charges. He also claimed that Mr. Trump had authorized him to ignore the committee’s demands and that legal memos written by the Justice Department shielded current and former presidential aides like himself from having to testify in front of Congress.

But in a series of rulings, some as recently as last week, Judge Carl J. Nichols systematically swept away those arguments, leaving Mr. Bannon and his lawyers little to work with. The rulings by Judge Nichols, a former law clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas who was appointed by Mr. Trump, were detrimental enough to Mr. Bannon’s chances in court that one of his lawyers, David I. Schoen, sarcastically asked Judge Nichols why his client should bother to go to trial.

Mr. Bannon did, however, have one more gambit up his sleeve, reversing course at the 11th hour by offering to testify to the committee. In court papers, prosecutors dismissed the move as a stunt, likening Mr. Bannon to a bank robber who returned the money he had stolen in a ploy to get the charges against him dropped.

The defense squabbled again on Tuesday morning with the judge and prosecutors over the limitations it faced, asking for a one-month delay that Judge Nichols ultimately denied.

“Mr. Bannon has a full story for why he didn’t show up — his advice of counsel, the invocation of executive privilege, questions about its validity and so on,” Mr. Schoen said in court before opening arguments began. “All of these defenses and his story of the case have been barred by the court at the government’s request.”

The charges against Mr. Bannon center on his failure to appear before the House committee to give testimony in October and his failure to provide documents to the committee days later.

Another former aide to Mr. Trump, Peter Navarro, has also been charged with contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the committee. On the same weekend that prosecutors announced those charges, Justice Department officials revealed that they would not seek indictments against two other former Trump advisers who refused to comply with committee subpoenas, Mark Meadows, Mr. Trump’s final chief of staff, and Dan Scavino Jr., Mr. Meadows’s deputy.

After a lengthy selection process, a jury of nine men and five women were seated on Tuesday afternoon, several of whom said they had watched or seen clips of hearings held by the Jan. 6 committee.

The defense had previously filed motions to delay the trial, saying that the continuing televised hearings held by the House committee and news coverage of the charges against Mr. Bannon would make it difficult to gather a neutral jury. The judge declined to do so, but advised jurors on Tuesday not to consume news or social media about the trial, which may overlap with a public hearing the committee is expected to hold on Thursday night.

TAGGED:Bannon, Stephen KExecutive Privilege, Doctrine ofHouse Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th AttackJustice DepartmentStorming of the US Capitol (Jan, 2021)The Washington MailTrump, Donald JUnited States Politics and Government
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Selma Blair says if ‘Legally Blonde’ had ended with Elle and Vivian holding hands, ‘I would’ve loved that so much’ Selma Blair says if ‘Legally Blonde’ had ended with Elle and Vivian holding hands, ‘I would’ve loved that so much’
Next Article RHOBH ‘s Erika Girardi Hit with 5,000 Lawsuit from Nicolas Cage’s Ex-Girlfriend Christina Fulton RHOBH ‘s Erika Girardi Hit with $745,000 Lawsuit from Nicolas Cage’s Ex-Girlfriend Christina Fulton

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Our commitment to accuracy, impartiality, and delivering breaking news as it happens has earned us the trust of a vast audience. Stay ahead with real-time updates on the latest events, trends.
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
InstagramFollow
LinkedInFollow
MediumFollow
QuoraFollow
- Advertisement -
Ad image

Popular Posts

U.S. forces detain 6 Islamic State group militants in Syria

BEIRUT (AP) — American forces conducted three raids in eastern Syria and arrested six Islamic…

By Enspirers | Editorial Board

Live updates | Putin blames West for food, energy crises

MOSCOW – Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday blamed the West for emerging global food…

By Enspirers | Editorial Board

Ukrainians are united against Putin’s plan to conquer their land: ‘Get lost. It’s never going to happen.’

The Kremlin’s forces are advancing in the east and now control 20 percent of Ukrainian…

By Enspirers | Editorial Board

Antipasto Charcuterie Wreath – The Recipe Critic

This web site could comprise affiliate hyperlinks and promoting in order that we will present…

By Enspirers | Editorial Board

You Might Also Like

Trump Proves Doubters Improper Once more With Huge Commerce Deal
Politics

Trump Proves Doubters Improper Once more With Huge Commerce Deal

By Enspirers | Editorial Board
80 Professional-Palestinian Protesters Arrested At Columbia College  
Politics

80 Professional-Palestinian Protesters Arrested At Columbia College  

By Enspirers | Editorial Board
DHS Secretary Calls For Loss of life Penalty For two Alleged Human Smugglers
Politics

DHS Secretary Calls For Loss of life Penalty For two Alleged Human Smugglers

By Enspirers | Editorial Board
Republicans Mull Federal Cuts To FBI, IRS, Abortion Providers And Extra
Politics

Republicans Mull Federal Cuts To FBI, IRS, Abortion Providers And Extra

By Enspirers | Editorial Board
America Age
Facebook Twitter Youtube

About US


America Age: Your instant connection to breaking stories and live updates. Stay informed with our real-time coverage across politics, tech, entertainment, and more. Your reliable source for 24/7 news.

Company
  • About Us
  • Newsroom Policies & Standards
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Careers
  • Media & Community Relations
  • WP Creative Group
  • Accessibility Statement
Contact Us
  • Contact Us
  • Contact Customer Care
  • Advertise
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Request a Correction
  • Contact the Newsroom
  • Send a News Tip
  • Report a Vulnerability
Terms of Use
  • Digital Products Terms of Sale
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Settings
  • Submissions & Discussion Policy
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Ad Choices
© 2024 America Age. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?