The Los Angeles Dodgers lately received the eighth World Sequence championship in franchise historical past and their second in 5 seasons.
A workforce has not received back-to-back World Sequence championships because the New York Yankees received three in a row from 1998-2000.
In recent times, the Dodgers have spent a ton of cash on payroll to construct a dominant roster, and there was speak in regards to the impact of superteams on Main League Baseball.
MLB analyst Ken Rosenthal lately revealed his ideas on whether or not superteams are good for baseball.
“It’s got to be frustrating (for smaller market teams). Of course it’s frustrating,” Rosenthal mentioned, through Foul Territory.
Are superteams good for baseball? 🤔@Ken_Rosenthal says it must be irritating for followers of smaller market groups. pic.twitter.com/Oasj5JaS77
— Foul Territory (@FoulTerritoryTV) November 29, 2024
There have been superteams in different skilled sports activities, most notably within the NBA, however baseball seems to be trending towards having a number of groups which can be miles higher than the remainder.
Though the Dodgers have a excessive payroll and a dominant roster on paper, they nonetheless should win the massive video games within the playoffs, which has resulted in simply two World Sequence titles previously 5 seasons regardless of some dominant common season information.
Rosenthal questions if superteams are good for the game, particularly saying that small-market groups needs to be annoyed by groups just like the Dodgers and New York Yankees.
Though it makes defeating these groups that rather more satisfying, the sum of money spent on their rosters makes defeating them tough.
The Yankees was once often known as baseball’s superteam with their 27 World Sequence titles, however the Dodgers are the latest membership to succeed in that standing.
It could be attention-grabbing to get the opinions of a few of the smaller market groups about this query.
NEXT:
Nolan Arenado Is Reportedly Open To A Place Change
