The competitors watchdog has instructed Qantas and Virgin it can maintain a “vigilant” eye on their air fares, because it warns the dominant carriers might capitalise on the axing of Rex’s competing inter-city flights by growing ticket costs on excessive demand routes.
The Australian Competitors and Client Fee (ACCC) issued a bleak evaluation of airline competitors when releasing its newest quarterly home aviation monitoring report – a government-ordered train – on Thursday, its first because the liquidation of funds provider Bonza in July and Rex’s entry into voluntary administration.
Within the report, the ACCC warned that Rex’s exit from main metropolis routes, so quickly after Bonza’s collapse earlier within the 12 months, implies that decrease air fares that Australians had loved because of elevated competitors difficult the Qantas and Virgin duopoly – which incorporates the previous’s funds provider Jetstar – might now finish.
“The ACCC cautions that consumers may miss out on the benefits of a more competitive domestic airline market if Rex is unable to re-commence its services between metropolitan cities,” the ACCC mentioned.
Whereas Rex’s regional companies stay in operation as a brand new purchaser is sought, few within the business anticipate a resumption of the airline’s Boeing 737 companies between main cities, together with the profitable Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane golden triangle.
“While Bonza and Rex provided relatively limited jet capacity on these metropolitan competing routes, the exit of both airlines on these routes may mean that consumers face higher air fares and reduced choice for domestic travel,” the watchdog added.
The ACCC report famous airline competitors had been at report highs earlier than turmoil engulfed Bonza and Rex’s jet operations. For the primary time in Australian historical past, there had been 4 airline teams competing on a single route – between Melbourne and the Gold Coast from November 2023 till Bonza’s flights ceased in April.
Even after Bonza’s collapse, in June routes serviced by three airline teams represented 50% of home passengers.
“Compared to their 2019 levels, air fares on routes with increased competition have been lower than the broader domestic network in every month since February 2023, indicating that increased competition has resulted in lower air fares for consumers,” the ACCC mentioned.
By July, after Bonza’s collapse and Rex’s axing of jet companies, no home route has greater than two competing airline teams, the ACCC mentioned.
The watchdog additionally discovered that on the routes between main cities the place Rex launched companies to rival Qantas Group and Virgin, the airways competing on the contested routes generated much less income from the common passenger in contrast with 2019 figures in addition to air fares within the broader community of routes unaffected by new entrants.
The ACCC mentioned the decrease air fares passenger revenues have been immediately pushed by Rex’s resolution to develop and immediately compete with the Qantas and Virgin duopoly on main metropolis routes from 2021.
Anna Brakey, ACCC commissioner, mentioned air fares fell by about 25% throughout when Rex stepped up its competitors.
“With the suspension of Rex’s services between metropolitan cities, we are closely monitoring air fares and remain vigilant to any increases in prices on routes that Rex is no longer flying on.”
Brakey instructed Guardian Australia that extra competitors not solely results in decrease air fares, however pressures rival airways into higher on time performances and cancelling fewer flights.
Brakey pointed to departmental cancellation information launched on Wednesday exhibiting that in July, Qantas cancelled 10.7% of flights on the Melbourne-Sydney route. In the meantime, when Rex flew the service, in some months it cancelled no flights in any respect.
Brakey mentioned that bettering entry to Sydney Airport for these eager to develop – a hurdle lengthy flagged by airport bosses, airways and business specialists – “may have assisted Rex” in additional competing between main cities.
The ACCC has beforehand alleged that Qantas and Virgin strategically schedule flights – thereby occupying a take off or touchdown slot, earlier than cancelling it – purely to retain a slot and stop rivals launching rival companies from Sydney Airport, the place a curfew and hourly cap imply slots are scarce.
Critics level to the cancellation charge on the Sydney-Melbourne route – as excessive as one in 10 flights – as proof of so-called “slot hoarding” by Qantas and Virgin, however the two corporations have repeatedly denied they misuse slots.
Suggestions from a 2021 assessment to spice up competitors at Sydney weren’t applied by the Morrison authorities, nor by the Albanese authorities so far.