The new commander of Russian forces in Ukraine said Tuesday that his troops in the country’s south were facing “a rather difficult” situation after a Ukrainian counteroffensive pushed them back and threatened their supply lines.
“Our further plans and actions regarding the city of Kherson itself will depend on the emerging military tactical situation,” Gen. Sergei Surovikin said. “Difficult decisions could not be ruled out,” he added in a rare interview with Russian state television that came not long after he was installed by the Kremlin.
The rare admission follows weeks of harsh criticism of Moscow’s military leadership by the country’s vocal pro-war faction, accusing officials of humiliating failures they then sought to cover up with domestic propaganda. Those hard-line critics cheered the appointment of Surovikin, nicknamed “General Armageddon” for his brutality, and the subsequent wave of attacks on infrastructure and civilian targets across Ukraine.
The Kremlin’s hawks welcomed the sobering public assessment as a marked departure from its approach to what it still calls its “special military operation” in Ukraine.
Surovikin’s comments were followed by Russian-installed officials in the region announcing the evacuation of as many as 60,000 civilians from the right bank of the Dnieper River — where Ukrainians have made recent advances — further south or into Russia.
Voluntary evacuations in the region were first announced last week, but the new statements carried a sudden urgency.
“The Ukrainian side is building up forces for a large-scale offensive,” the head of the Moscow-appointed regional administration, Vladimir Saldo, said Tuesday in a message on the Telegram messaging app, urging his fellow residents to leave as he said Russian forces were erecting defenses.
His deputy, Kirill Stremousov, was more direct, saying in a separate message on Telegram: “In the very near future, the battle for Kherson will begin.” No one is planning to surrender the city, he added, as he urged residents to take the warnings seriously and not get “in the way” of the Russian military as it digs in.
Civilians were already crossing the river by boat Wednesday morning, the Russian state news agency Tass reported, as text messages with urgent reminders were sent out to residents, and Saldo said there would be no entry to the right bank of the Dnieper River for at least seven days.
Some in Kyiv reacted to the effort as a sign of the Kremlin’s weakening grip.
“Reality can hurt if you live in a fictional fantasy world,” Mykhailo Podolyak, an adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said in a tweet. Local Ukrainian officials urged people to ignore evacuation calls, arguing that the Russians “want to take our people hostage and use them as human shields.”
Kherson is a strategic gateway to the Black Sea and the neighboring Crimean Peninsula, and has been critical in cementing Moscow’s grasp on the area. It’s the only regional center that Russia has controlled since the start of the war.
Ukraine has been laying the ground for a counteroffensive there for months, striking key bridges and military infrastructure, while also advancing in the east. Earlier this month, Kyiv said it liberated a number of settlements after an initial breakthrough in the north of the region.
Losing Kherson would deal a major blow to the Kremlin, which has intensified its commitment to the conflict — boosting its ailing forces with a troop call-up, hitting civilians and energy infrastructure and issuing renewed nuclear threats.
The evacuations and comments appeared to suggest that Russia was preparing for a decisive fight for Kherson, but Western military analysts said they could also signal that the Kremlin may be planning a withdrawal to avoid the threat of another haphazard retreat like the one in Ukraine’s northeast last month.
The introduction of martial law in the four occupied regions is likely a “face-saving” measure for Putin as he faces the prospect of giving up more ground in Kherson, Michael A. Horowitz, a geopolitical and security analyst, and the head of intelligence at Le Beck consultancy, told NBC News.
And given Putin’s threat to use nuclear weapons to defend territories he considers Russian, Horowitz added, Wednesday’s move may be an attempt to further raise the ante in that sense.
“The Russian military has been rumored to be pushing for a withdrawal for weeks, with some pushback from the Kremlin, and we may be seeing a reversal of this policy,” he said. “The partial mobilization hasn’t changed the broader dynamic and is quite unpopular in Russia, so Moscow may be forced to make some ‘difficult’ decisions, including abandoning Kherson or laying the groundwork for such a decision if necessary.”
While the Russian-installed officials warned civilians to flee before a Ukrainian offensive, analysts said Kyiv’s troops may want to force Moscow’s military to abandon the city of Kherson without a fight.
“Ukrainians in this war avoid urban battles and by enveloping Russian units, they force them to retreat,” said Konrad Muzyka, the director of the Poland-based Rochan Consulting, which specializes in Russia and Belarus. “I think they will want to do the same in Kherson.”
Still, Surovikin’s frankness about the state of affairs in the region was “odd,” he said, and raises questions about what really might be brewing, considering that “Russians hardly ever officially admit that something is wrong or about to go wrong.”
