This report is on the market solely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the information and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe right now.
It’s essentially the most contentious U.S. presidential election cycle in latest reminiscence — and the brokerage world will not be immune from its impression.
As Intel examined final week, actual property brokers have been tiptoeing round uncomfortable political matters with a few of their shoppers.
However a brand new survey of three,000 U.S. shoppers in early October reveals the ways in which supporters of the 2 main presidential candidates — Donald Trump and Kamala Harris — typically method the homebuying course of by distinctive lenses.
The most recent Inman-Dig Insights shopper survey means that in Harris supporters, brokers are discovering shoppers who’re extra prepared to belief brokers and to take a conventional method to itemizing their houses on the market. In the meantime, shoppers who’re inclined to help Trump are typically a bit extra reluctant to take an agent’s recommendation, at the same time as they largely nonetheless find yourself on the identical web page.
Intel drills deep this week with breakdowns of energetic homebuyers and sellers, doubtless near-future patrons, and U.S. shoppers broadly.
The evaluation sheds mild on shopper attitudes on the NAR settlement, fee negotiation practices, and what’s bringing patrons to the market right now within the first place.
See how Trump supporters and Harris supporters are approaching the market in a different way right now — and the numerous areas they’ve in widespread — within the full report.
Incomes belief on the margins
In Intel’s month-to-month surveys of actual property professionals, brokerage leaders routinely say they suppose shoppers have a low opinion of actual property brokers proper now.
However when Intel surveys working-age U.S. adults throughout the nation, they report the precise reverse.
- Clear majorities of each Harris supporters and Trump supporters report having a optimistic opinion of actual property brokers, with fewer than 1 in 10 members of both group reporting they’ve a unfavourable impression of brokers total.
That mentioned, supporters of the Republican presidential ticket have been a bit extra more likely to have an ambivalent and even unfavourable perspective towards brokers than their Democratic counterparts.
And so they’re much less more likely to say their esteem of brokers has improved over the previous 12 months.
- 42 p.c of Harris supporters say their opinion of actual property brokers has improved over the previous yr, with solely 7 p.c saying their opinion has worsened.
- By comparability, 36 p.c of Trump supporters say they suppose extra extremely of brokers right now than they did a yr in the past, with 9 p.c saying their opinion has worsened.
This truth touches on a broader theme that emerged throughout a variety of questions on this survey: some Trump supporters are likelier to start out out with decrease belief for brokers and the system through which they function, and will take extra efforts to persuade in consequence.
However brokers who put in that additional effort are more likely to break by with their shoppers, the survey outcomes recommend.
The artwork of the deal
When requested concerning the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors’ proposed settlement, most People say they nonetheless haven’t heard of it.
However Harris supporters in early October have been extra more likely to say they have been a minimum of loosely aware of the NAR deal — and extra more likely to consider the deal is nice for shoppers.
- 32 p.c of Harris supporters informed the survey that they have been conscious of a latest settlement involving NAR. By comparability, 26 p.c of Trump supporters surveyed have been conscious of the settlement.
- 64 p.c of Harris supporters who mentioned that they had heard of the deal had the impression it was good for shoppers. Almost 59 p.c of Trump supporters who have been aware of the deal agreed with that concept.
- Nonetheless, 11 p.c of Trump supporters with information of the NAR deal mentioned it was good for neither shoppers nor the actual property business. That’s in comparison with solely 5 p.c of Harris supporters who shared the identical skepticism towards the deal.
These outcomes replicate the opinions of the broader inhabitants, a lot of whom should not seeking to transfer any time quickly, or could solely be beginning to take into account a transfer a couple of months down the road.
However the shoppers who have been energetic available on the market — and dealing with brokers — in early October have been far more engaged with the questions at hand.
An altered battlefield
Intel needed to know the way energetic patrons and sellers are navigating the modifications, and — as a matter of curiosity — how their approaches could be completely different in line with their voting intention within the coming election.
Intel discovered proof that when they really hit the market, Harris-supporting shoppers are a bit extra deferential to the previous establishment — on each the client facet and the vendor facet.
And that begins with the fee charges that Harris supporters are agreeing to pay.
Trump supporters available on the market in early October have been extra more likely to report reaching a sub-2 p.c compensation charge with their purchaser’s agent — however no extra more likely to say they achieved that by precise charge negotiation.
- 25 p.c of Trump supporters mentioned they signed an settlement with their purchaser’s agent that pledged to pay near 1.5 p.c of the transaction or much less.
- Solely 17 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned their purchaser’s agent settlement had a compensation charge that low.
This was not essentially resulting from Trump supporters driving a harder negotiation, nonetheless.
- 19 p.c of Trump supporters mentioned they efficiently negotiated their purchaser’s agent payment down from a better quantity — nearly precisely as many Harris supporters who mentioned the identical.
However which will change as extra shoppers grow to be aware of the brand new panorama.
- Extra Republicans mentioned they weren’t conscious that their purchaser’s agent payment was negotiable earlier than signing the settlement — 35 p.c of Trump supporters vs. solely 29 p.c amongst Harris supporters.
So if it’s not a negotiation query, then why are extra Trump supporters paying decrease fee charges?
It’s tough to say for positive. There could also be different components the survey didn’t ask about — comparable to market-specific or brokerage-specific issues, and even sampling points within the survey itself — that assist clarify the hole on the client facet.
The survey revealed variations between the 2 teams on the vendor facet as nicely.
Harris supporters who’re itemizing a house have been considerably extra more likely to take a strictly conventional method to their itemizing — agreeing up entrance to cowl the agent payment for any purchaser who purchases their house.
- 50 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned they have been taking this conventional method to their itemizing, in comparison with 41 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
As a substitute, Trump supporters have been a bit extra more likely to say they have been withholding the client’s agent payment up entrance as a negotiating tactic, however that they’d be prepared to cowl it in the long run.
They have been additionally a bit extra more likely to take a agency stance towards overlaying the payment.
And — as seen in response to different settlement-related questions — extra Trump supporters mentioned that they have been unaware of the brand new choices.
The first drivers
Lastly, Intel explored why individuals who have plans to maneuver within the coming months are contemplating taking this step.
Once more, the 2 teams shared a lot in widespread when it got here to their high causes for transferring. However some distinct variations did emerge within the responses.
Trump supporters usually tend to say they’re transferring as a result of…
- …they’re anticipating, or planning to have, a toddler — Doubtless patrons who help Trump have been extra more likely to say they have been seeking to purchase a house associated to having a toddler. Greater than 16 p.c of Trump supporters named this as their motive for probably shopping for, in comparison with fewer than 12 p.c of Harris supporters who mentioned the identical.
Harris supporters usually tend to say they’re transferring as a result of…
- …they’re drawn to the monetary advantages of homeownership — 28 p.c of Harris supporters gave this motive, in comparison with 22 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
- …they’re in search of a greater faculty district — 14 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned they have been motivated by higher faculties, in comparison with 11 p.c of pro-Trump shoppers.
- …they wish to transfer nearer to household — 30 p.c of Harris supporters chosen this selection, narrowly edging out the 27 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
Taken collectively, it’s clear that Trump supporters and Harris supporters have a lot in widespread, a minimum of with regards to how they method the housing market.
However by bringing shoppers up to the mark and incomes belief the place some are skeptical, brokers might be able to bridge gaps the place they exist in a polarized — and continually evolving — actual property atmosphere.
Concerning the Inman-Dig Insights shopper survey
The Inman-Dig Insights shopper survey was performed from Oct. 4-6, 2024, to gauge the opinions and behaviors of People associated to homebuying.
The survey sampled a various group of three,000 American adults, ranging in age from 24 to 65 and employed both full-time or part-time. The members have been chosen to provide a broadly consultant breakdown by age, gender and area.
Statistical rigor was maintained all through the research, and the outcomes ought to be largely consultant of attitudes held by U.S. adults on this age group with full- or part-time jobs. Each Inman and Dig Insights are majority-owned by Toronto-based Beringer Capital.
