The NBA not too long ago modified a serious rule about end-of-season awards, and a few persons are nonetheless sad about it.
Talking on his present, Gilbert Arenas stated that the 65-game rule enacted final season is admittedly hurting the league and in addition harming the legacy of gamers.
He referenced Joel Embiid, who was prohibited from profitable MVP final season as a result of he didn’t play in 65 video games.
Arenas stated if that rule utilized to all of NBA historical past, the league would look very completely different.
The 65-game minimal requirement for end-of-season awards is f’ing up the sport 😒 pic.twitter.com/nmydysSYXU
— Gilbert Arenas (@GilsArenaShow) October 9, 2024
Arenas stated Embiid “is probably the best player in the league” however shedding out on MVP gained’t “mirror” that.
Earlier than final season’s damage, it appeared like he was on his strategy to profitable one other Most Helpful Participant.
He averaged 34.7 factors, and 11 rebounds in the course of the season, that are stellar numbers.
However as a result of he didn’t play in 65 video games, he wasn’t eligible for any awards.
That isn’t truthful, in accordance with Arenas, who stated voters are conscious of how a lot a participant does or doesn’t take part.
They know the quantity of video games somebody performs in and nonetheless make their selections regardless of that.
The NBA created this rule partly as a strategy to battle load administration and so they succeeded with that.
However this additionally led to Embiid lacking a trophy though he was legitimately damage.
The pushback on this rule has been robust and coming from completely different folks.
Does that imply the NBA will change its tune and alter the rule or will they keep it up within the seasons forward?
NEXT:
Analyst Believes It is Going To Be A Tough Yr For Bronny James
