Anthony Albanese has accused the Labor senator Fatima Payman of disrupting and undermining the federal government by vowing to repeat her vote for a Greens motions on Palestine, which he derided as a “stunt” and “indulgence”.
The prime minister suspended Payman indefinitely from Labor’s caucus on Sunday after an interview with ABC’s Insiders wherein the Western Australian senator mentioned she would once more cross the ground if confronted with one other Senate movement to recognise the state of Palestine.
With a slew of cost-of-living measures taking impact from Monday – together with revamped earnings tax cuts, $300 electrical energy rebates and a rise within the minimal wage – Albanese mentioned he had determined to self-discipline Payman partially due to her disruption of the federal government’s message.
By participating within the interview Payman “chose to … disrupt Labor and what we are doing today, the day before the most significant assistance that has been given to working people in a very long period of time”, the prime minister mentioned.
Requested why Payman had been suspended, Albanese informed ABC Radio: “Well, let’s be very clear – it’s not because of her support for a policy position that she’s advocating.”
As an alternative of speaking about tax cuts and cost-of-living reduction “you have seamlessly segued into the actions of an individual, which is designed to undermine what is the collective position that the Labor party has determined”, he mentioned.
“No individual is bigger than the team. And Fatima Payman is welcome to return to participating in the team if she accepts [that] she’s a member of it.”
Albanese mentioned Labor’s guidelines required that members vote consistent with caucus choices, in “a process where people participate, people respect each other and people don’t engage in an indulgence” comparable to Payman’s choice to cross the ground.
Final week the Greens and the Coalition joined forces to reject a proposed authorities modification to the movement’s wording that embraced a “two-state solution” and, if accepted, would have allowed all Labor senators to vote for the movement.
Payman has been defended by Labor Mates of Palestine, who famous that the ALP platform incorporates a “commitment to recognising the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for self-determination within a sovereign state”.
However Albanese mentioned Labor “supports a Palestinian state existing onside alongside an Israeli state”.
“We don’t support a one-state solution.” he mentioned. “The resolution moved by the Greens does nothing to advance the peace process. Pretending that the Senate recognises states is quite frankly untenable.”
On Sunday Payman reiterated that she supported a two-state resolution and that she believed Israel had a proper to exist.
Albanese mentioned he understood that Israel’s navy motion in Gaza after the 7 October Hamas assaults had resulted in a “very difficult period” for sections of the Australian group, together with the Islamic group.
He added that this “is why we need actually real solutions, not gestures and stunts from the Greens”.
“This stunt from the Greens was designed to put Fatima Payman in a difficult position … It wasn’t designed to assist Palestinians in Gaza. It wasn’t designed to advance the peace process. And it was counterproductive.”
In a joint assertion Muslim teams together with the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils and the Australian Nationwide Imams Council mentioned Payman had been punished for “voting with her conscience against genocide”.
“Her stance was a commitment to justice and the right thing to do,” it mentioned, including: “Australians and millions across the world demand decisive action in the form of sanctions and an immediate stop to weapons trade and training.”
The Muslim teams accused Labor abandoning the folks it represents and permitting occasion politics “to dominate the voices of the people”.
Anne Aly, the minister for youth and early childhood training, mentioned she hoped Payman remained within the Labor occasion.
“I fought long and hard to ensure that we have a diverse representation in our parliament,” she mentioned on Monday. “I think our party is better for that diversity and I think our government and this parliament is better for their diversity.”